Insights

Data quality best practices

Every flawed business decision, mis-targeted marketing campaign, and inaccurate financial forecast shares a common, often invisible, origin: a breakdown in data quality. This isn’t just about minor typos; it’s about the very foundation upon which a modern enterprise is built. Many organizations operate on a principle they wouldn’t dare accept in the physical world –… Continue reading Data quality best practices

Karolina Fox Profile Karolina Fox
Published on:
Database icon with surrounding symbols representing data quality best practices.

Every flawed business decision, mis-targeted marketing campaign, and inaccurate financial forecast shares a common, often invisible, origin: a breakdown in data quality.

This isn’t just about minor typos; it’s about the very foundation upon which a modern enterprise is built. Many organizations operate on a principle they wouldn’t dare accept in the physical world – building critical structures on a foundation they can’t fully trust.

The financial toll of this neglect is staggering. Industry experts often cite the “1-10-100 Rule” as a powerful illustration of the escalating cost. It suggests that it costs $1 to verify a record at the point of entry, $10 to cleanse and correct it later, and a staggering $100 – or more – in losses if nothing is done at all. When you multiply that $100 by thousands or millions of records, the true cost comes into sharp focus, silently draining resources and sabotaging growth.

This is the tangible impact of poor data quality. From duplicate customer entries that skew analytics to incomplete product data that disrupts the supply chain, these problems are more than just IT headaches; they are fundamental data quality issues with strategic consequences.

This article provides the strategic response to that challenge. We will move beyond firefighting and outline the essential best practices required to build a resilient data foundation – transforming your data from a potential liability into your most powerful asset.

Key takeaways

  • Establish governance first: Before any cleanup, define clear ownership and rules for your data. Accountability is the non-negotiable foundation for everything else.
  • Adopt a proactive lifecycle: Shift from simply reacting to errors. Focus on preventing bad data at the source (Quality Assurance) and have a systematic process for fixing what slips through (Quality Improvement).
  • Measure what matters: You can’t improve what you don’t measure. Regularly assess your data using concrete metrics to identify weak spots, prioritize efforts, and track progress over time.
  • Make quality everyone’s job: Foster a culture where every team member – from sales to marketing to finance – understands their role in maintaining data integrity. Data quality is a shared business responsibility, not just an IT task.
  • Connect efforts to ROI: Always translate your data quality improvements into tangible business value, such as cost savings, risk reduction, or increased revenue, to secure lasting executive support.

The foundation: data governance and data management

Attempting to clean data without first establishing clear rules is a futile exercise. A solid foundation for data quality begins not with disparate tools, but with a unified structure for accountability and clear standards for success.

The first pillar: understanding data governance

The first pillar of this foundation is Data Governance. Think of it as the official rulebook for your company’s data. It’s a formal framework that defines who is authorized to handle specific data, what actions they can take, and the processes they must follow.

By establishing clear ownership and stewardship, governance moves data quality from a vague, collective responsibility to a system of clear, individual accountability. It ensures that all subsequent quality efforts are consistent, authoritative, and aligned with business objectives.

In practice, it means: Imagine a vast public library with no librarians and no catalog system. Books are everywhere, some are damaged, and finding a specific piece of information is nearly impossible.

This is data without governance – a chaotic, unreliable asset where everyone hopes “someone” will clean it up.

Data governance is the act of hiring librarians and creating the catalog.

  • A Data Owner is like the Head Librarian. They don’t manage every single book, but they are ultimately responsible for the entire collection – its budget, its overall strategy, and its value to the community. They own the outcome.
  • A Data Steward is like the specialist History Librarian. They are the hands-on expert for the history section. They don’t own the books, but they are accountable for ensuring every history book is correctly labeled, in good condition, and easy to find. If you have a question about the history section, you go to them.

This system transforms the library from a chaotic mess into a trustworthy resource. It replaces the vague “someone should fix this” with a clear model where the History Librarian is accountable for the history section, ensuring everyone can confidently use it for their research.

Defining “good”: key metrics for data accuracy and data integrity

Once the rules are set, you need a way to keep score. “Good quality” cannot be an abstract goal; it must be a measurable state.

This is accomplished by defining clear benchmarks for what constitutes acceptable data across several key dimensions. These standards, commonly known as [data quality metrics](link-to-data-quality-metrics), provide an objective way to measure critical attributes like accuracy, completeness, and timeliness.

Without these metrics, improvement is impossible to track, and the business value of your efforts remains invisible.

In practice, it means: Think of data metrics as a doctor’s report for a patient. A doctor doesn’t just say a patient is “unhealthy.” They provide specific numbers: blood pressure is 140/90, cholesterol is 220 mg/dL. Similarly, data metrics don’t just say data is “bad”; they state, “2% of customer records are missing a phone number,” providing a precise diagnosis needed for treatment.

Visualizing success with dashboards

Finally, these rules and metrics cannot exist in a hidden report. To drive real change and foster accountability, quality must be made visible to the entire organization.

The most effective way to achieve this is through a centralized, accessible data quality dashboard.

This dashboard acts as a real-time health monitor for your data assets, transforming abstract metrics into actionable insights and fostering a shared sense of responsibility among business and technical teams alike.

Data quality management best practices: a practical framework

With a solid foundation of governance and measurement in place, you can implement the day-to-day disciplines that create and sustain high-quality data.

These five best practices represent a comprehensive program, moving from high-level strategy to on-the-ground execution.

Each practice builds upon the last, creating a powerful cycle of continuous improvement.

Practice 1: establish a robust data governance framework

While the foundation sets the “what” and “why” of governance, this practice is about the “how.” It involves operationalizing your rulebook by formally defining and assigning roles like Data Owners and Data Stewards.

It means creating a centralized business glossary where terms like “Active Customer” have one, undisputed definition across the entire enterprise. This practice transforms governance from a theoretical concept into a living, breathing part of your organization’s workflow, ensuring that policies are not just written down, but are actively enforced and managed.

It is the single most important practice for achieving scalable and sustainable data quality.

Expert insight: accelerating governance with Collibra

Implementing a comprehensive data governance framework is a significant undertaking. This is where leading platforms like Collibra provide immense value by operationalizing and automating the entire process.

As certified Collibra implementation partners, Murdio specializes in tailoring this powerful platform to an organization’s unique needs, ensuring you establish a scalable and effective framework right from day one.

Practice 2: assess and understand data across your enterprise

You cannot fix what you cannot see. The practice of conducting regular data quality assessments is the equivalent of a routine health check for your data assets.

Instead of waiting for a business report to fail or a customer to complain, this proactive discipline involves systematically analyzing your key datasets to understand their condition. It helps you diagnose the root causes of errors, quantify their potential impact, and strategically prioritize which problems to tackle first.

This isn’t a one-time event; it’s a recurring activity that provides the ongoing intelligence needed to guide your quality initiatives effectively.

For a step-by-step guide on how to perform these crucial health checks, see our detailed article on data quality assessment.

Practice 3: enforce proactive data quality assurance

The most efficient way to handle errors is to prevent them from ever entering your systems. Data quality assurance is the practice of embedding preventative measures directly into your data lifecycle.

Think of it as a quality inspector on a factory assembly line.

By building validation rules and automated checks into your data entry forms, application interfaces, and data integration pipelines, you can catch and correct issues at the source.

This proactive approach is far less costly and disruptive than downstream data cleansing, preserving the integrity of your data from the moment of its creation.

In practice, it means: This is like a chef tasting ingredients as they arrive from a supplier. The chef ensures the vegetables are fresh and the fish is high-quality before they start cooking. By catching a problem early, they prevent a bad dish from ever being made and sent to a customer.

To learn the specific techniques for building these preventative measures into your systems, explore our guide to data quality assurance.

Practice 4: a repeatable system for improving data

Despite the best preventative measures, some data errors will inevitably slip through. When they do, the worst response is an ad-hoc, chaotic scramble to fix them.

A core best practice is to establish a formal, repeatable process for data remediation. This involves creating a system to log data issues, a framework to prioritize them based on business impact, a clear workflow to assign them to the correct data steward (as defined by your governance), and a feedback loop to track them to resolution.

This systematic approach ensures that problems are not just patched, but are resolved efficiently and permanently.

In practice, it means: Continuing the chef analogy, this is what happens when a customer sends a dish back. The restaurant doesn’t just remake the plate; they have a system. They log the issue (the steak was overcooked), the head chef identifies the root cause (a new cook wasn’t trained properly), and they implement new training to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

It’s a reactive, systematic process to fix a known error and improve the underlying system.

We’ve created a complete framework for this process in our article on data quality improvement.

Practice 5: centralizing information with master data management

While strategy and process come first, technology is the essential accelerator that allows you to execute your data quality program at scale.

The right tools empower your team by automating the laborious tasks of profiling, cleansing, monitoring, and reporting. They make your governance policies tangible and provide the horsepower needed to manage millions or billions of records consistently. Viewing technology as a strategic enabler, rather than a silver-bullet solution, is the key to unlocking its full potential.

The goal is to equip the people responsible for data quality with the tools they need to be successful and efficient.

Choosing the right platform is a critical strategic decision. To help you navigate the market, we have a detailed guide on how to choose a data quality platform.

Here is a summary of the core data quality best practices:

Best practice Core principle Key activities Business impact
1. Establish a governance framework Define the rules and owners. • Assigning Data Stewards

• Creating a business glossary

• Setting data policies

Creates accountability and ensures consistent, authoritative data management across the enterprise.
2. Conduct regular assessments You can’t fix what you can’t see. • Profiling data sources

• Identifying root causes of errors

• Prioritizing issues by impact

Provides clear visibility into data health and enables strategic, targeted improvement efforts.
3. Enforce quality assurance Prevention over cure. • Building validation rules into forms

• Checking data at the point of entry

• Standardizing data formats

Reduces downstream costs and errors by stopping bad data before it enters your systems.
4. Systematize improvement Create a repeatable fix process. • Logging data issues

• Creating a remediation workflow

• Tracking fixes to resolution

Ensures efficient and permanent resolution of data errors, preventing recurring problems.
5. Leverage the right technology Empower process with technology. • Automating profiling & monitoring

• Scaling cleansing efforts

• Providing a central platform

Increases the efficiency, scale, and overall effectiveness of the entire data quality program.

Beyond the technical: fostering a lasting culture of quality

Implementing the technical practices and tools is essential, but to make them truly last, they must be supported by a company-wide culture that treats high-quality data as a shared, critical asset.

Technology can fix a record, but only culture can prevent it from being broken again.

Beyond the basics: culture, data security, and proving roi

For decades, data quality was often viewed as a problem for the IT department to solve. A true culture of quality dismantles this siloed thinking by fostering shared ownership, which requires several key commitments from across the organization:

  • Executive sponsorship: Leadership must do more than just approve a budget. They need to consistently champion the importance of data quality in communications and strategic planning, setting the tone for the entire company.
  • Company-wide training: Education must extend beyond technical teams. The marketing associate, sales representative, and finance analyst all need to be trained on how their daily actions impact data integrity and equipped with the knowledge to be effective data stewards.
  • Clear and constant communication: Regularly share data quality goals, progress against metrics, and success stories. Making the initiative visible keeps it top-of-mind and transforms abstract goals into celebrated team wins.

Measure and communicate the business impact (ROI)

To secure long-term investment and executive buy-in, a data quality program must prove its worth in the language of business outcomes.

While technical metrics are crucial for monitoring, business leaders respond to tangible results. Instead of simply reporting “a 5% improvement in data accuracy,” translate that into “a 10% reduction in shipping errors, saving $75,000 in logistics costs.”

By consistently connecting data quality improvements to key performance indicators – be it cost savings, revenue growth, risk reduction, or customer satisfaction – you transform the program’s perception. It ceases to be a technical cost center and becomes a strategic value driver, making it far easier to justify continued resources and support.

Conclusion: making data quality your competitive advantage

Achieving data excellence is not the result of a single project or a magical software solution. It is the outcome of a deliberate, continuous commitment to a holistic program.

As we’ve explored, this journey is built upon three essential pillars: a robust governance foundation to set the rules, a consistent execution of core technical best practices to manage the data, and a supportive company-wide culture that empowers every employee to become a data steward.

By weaving these elements together, you transform data from a simple byproduct of business into your most reliable, strategic asset – the engine for confident decision-making and a true competitive advantage.

But you don’t have to build that engine alone. If you are ready to move from learning about data quality to actively mastering it, Murdio is here to guide you.

As certified experts in implementing Collibra’s industry-leading data governance platform, we provide the technical expertise and strategic guidance needed to turn your vision into a reality.

Contact Murdio today for a complimentary consultation to map your path to data clarity and value.

Frequently asked questions

1. What are data quality best practices?

Data quality best practices are a collection of strategic processes and practices for data quality designed to improve data quality and ensure information is fit for its intended purpose. These best practices for data go beyond simply fixing inaccurate data; they focus on how to proactively maintain data quality across the entire organization. This involves establishing clear quality standards and a framework to address common data quality challenges head-on.

2. What are the core elements and frameworks of data quality?

Understanding data quality involves recognizing several key frameworks that, while slightly different, all aim to achieve the same goal: ensuring data is fit for use. The best practices for data involve using these frameworks to establish clear quality standards and a common language for improvement.

The most comprehensive and widely accepted framework is the Six Core Dimensions of Data Quality. These are often referred to as the “6 rules” and are measured through regular data quality checks:

  1. Accuracy: Is the data correct and free from errors? This is the foundation for avoiding inaccurate data.
  2. Completeness: Are all required data fields present, especially after data collection?
  3. Consistency: Is data uniform across systems, or is there inconsistent data?
  4. Timeliness: Is the information available when needed to be useful?
  5. Uniqueness: Are there duplicate records for a single entity (e.g., the same customer listed twice)?
  6. Validity: This ensures data conforms to a specific format or set of rules (e.g., a correctly formatted email address).

Another popular, simplified framework is the “4 C’s of Data Quality,” which is especially useful when managing modern data:

  • Consistency: Data is uniform, even when pulling data from various sources.
  • Completeness: All required data, like critical customer data, is present.
  • Conformity: Data adheres to predefined standards.
  • Accuracy: The data correctly reflects the real-world entity it describes.

Ultimately, creating a data strategy isn’t just about knowing these terms; it’s about action. The goal is to implement data processes to proactively maintain data quality. This is how you improve data quality over the long term, turning persistent data quality challenges into a state of consistent, modern data quality.

 

Share this article